ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A comparison of movement-related neuronal activities in cerebellar- and basal ganglia-recipient regions of the macaque thalamus.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ventral lateral (VL) nucleus of the thalamus relays signals from the cerebellum (Cb) and basal ganglia (BG) to primary motor cortex (M1). In primates, glutamatergic Cb efferents from the deep cerebellar nuclei and GABAergic BG efferents from the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) terminate in distinct subregions of VL: the posterior (VLp) and anterior (VLa) divisions, respectively. This anatomical segregation suggests that Cb- and BG- thalamocortical circuits may play distinct roles in motor control, which could be revealed by comparing movement-related activity in VLp and VLa. Here, we recorded single-unit activity from VLp and VLa, identified via electrical stimulation of superior cerebellar peduncle and GPi, during a choice reaction time reaching task. We also recorded from M1, which maintains bidirectional connections with both VLp and VLa. Peri-movement increases in firing began earlier in VLp than in VLa whereas decrease-type responses were more prevalent and prolonged in duration in VLa neurons as compared with VLp and M1. Time-resolved general linear model analysis showed dynamic encoding of task parameters, particularly movement direction, in all three regions. Direction encoding was strongest in M1, moderate in VLp, and weakest in VLa. Direction encoding in VLa also lagged behind that in M1 and VLp. Clustering analysis of direction encoding strength and timing revealed a subpopulation of VLp neurons that encoded direction particularly strongly during the reaction time period. These results highlight a limitation of traditional assumptions that activity characteristics are distributed homogeneously across neural populations and suggest a novel functional organization within VLp neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.