ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Individuals with Intermittent Explosive Disorder Exhibit Idiosyncratic Neural Responses during Social-emotional Processing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intermittent explosive disorder (IED) is associated with impulsive aggression in ambiguous social contexts. Prior neuroimaging studies have treated IED as a homogenous group, but identical social situations may elicit divergent responses across IED individuals. Here, we test the hypothesis that IED is characterized by idiosyncratic neural responses to social cues during naturalistic social-emotional processing. IED individuals and healthy controls completed a validated paradigm where they were presented with video vignettes of interpersonal interactions while undergoing fMRI. We computed the intersubject correlation (ISC) in neural time courses between pairs of participants to quantify neural similarity, and assessed whether similarity differed between Healthy-Healthy and IED-IED dyads using Bayesian multilevel models, controlling for self-reported emotional responses and intention attributions for each vignette. Healthy-Healthy dyads showed significantly higher ISC than IED-IED dyads, indicating that neural responses to the videos were similar among healthy participants, but idiosyncratic in IED individuals. These effects were observed in regions in the default mode and salience networks, including the precuneus, medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, insula, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Individuals with IED exhibited idiosyncratic neural responses during naturalistic social-emotional processing, even after accounting for differences in emotional reaction and intention attribution. This neural idiosyncrasy may reflect atypical integration of social cues, giving rise to maladaptive interpretations and impulsive aggression. Assessing neural synchrony during ecologically valid paradigms offers a promising tool for identifying neural markers of interpersonal dysfunction and informing targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.