ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Dissociable contributions of cortical thickness and surface area to cognitive ageing: evidence from multiple longitudinal cohorts.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical volume, a widely-used marker of brain ageing, is the product of two genetically and developmentally dissociable morphometric features: thickness and area. However, it remains unclear whether these two features have dissociable consequences for cognitive ageing. To address this, we analyse cross-sectional and longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive data from one discovery cohort (Cam-CAN) and two independent, pre-registered replication cohorts (OASIS-3 and HABS-HD), leveraging wide age ranges across adulthood, different follow-up intervals and diverse population backgrounds. We show that thickness declines more steeply with age than does area, and shows stronger associations with longitudinal change in fluid cognitive abilities, fairly uniformly across the cortex. Cognitive change is also dependent on baseline thickness, independent of thickness change and independent of baseline cognitive ability. In contrast, area is comparatively stable across adulthood, at least until old age, and shows weaker and more heterogeneous associations with cognitive change, despite being a stronger mediator of the effect of polygenic scores on baseline cognitive ability. Together, these findings help to reconcile inconsistencies in the literature, and indicate that thickness provides a more sensitive marker of dynamic neurobiological processes underlying cognitive ageing, whereas area seems to reflect primarily stable, trait-like variation in cognitive ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.