ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Library docking for Cannabinoid-2 Receptor ligands.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cannabinoid receptors are therapeutically promising GPCRs that are also interesting test systems for structure-based methods, which have targeted them previously. Here we used the CB2 receptor as a template to explore several topical questions in library docking. Whereas an earlier campaign against the CB1 receptor led to potent but relatively non-selective ligands, here we found that targeting interactions with polar, orthosteric site residues led to subtype-selective ligands. Docking hit rate and especially hit affinity improved in moving from a 7 million to a 2.6 billion molecule library. Similar to earlier studies, docking against active and inactive states of the receptor did not reliably bias toward the discovery of agonists or inverse agonists. Cryo-EM structures of two of the new agonists, each in a different chemotype, superposed well on the docking predictions. Correspondingly, structure-based optimization led to 10- to 140-fold improvements within three different series, also consistent with well-behaved ligand families. Hit rates with a fully enumerated 2.6 billion molecule library resembled those of an implied 11 billion molecule library from a building-block method, consistent with the latter's ability to explore this space, though higher affinities were discovered from the fully enumerated set. Overall, eight diverse families of ligands, with potencies <100 nM and mostly unrelated to previously known ligands were found. Implications for future studies are considered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.