ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Heightened Distraction under Competition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study examine the extent to which attentional resources are allocated toward distracting affective and disorder-relevant pictures under task-relevant competition in participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; N = 33) and controls (N = 31). Competition between cues was examined using a foreground task where participants detected coherent motion in a flickering random dot kinematogram (RDK) overlaid on pictures ranging in emotional content (pleasant, neutral, unpleasant, and OCD-evoking pictures). Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) were measured in response to the flickering RDK and served as an index of visuocortical engagement with task-relevant cues. Data were also fitted to the distraction under competition model (DUC), a computational framework of attention selection. Group differences emerged with stronger visuocortical distraction (attenuated task engagement) in the OCD group, driven largely by the unpleasant pictures, followed by the OCD-evoking and pleasant pictures. Furthermore, the DUC model fit well in both groups and supported the results of the univariate analysis, demonstrating the magnitude of the visuocortical distraction observed in response to the unpleasant pictures, and the presence of substantial distraction in response to the OCD-evoking pictures in the OCD group. The present findings provide visuocortical evidence of heightened distraction in response to unpleasant and OCD-evoking pictures under task-relevant competition in OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.