ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Comparative analysis of wavelength-specific UV stress granule formation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stress Granules (SGs) are cytoplasmic biomolecular condensates that form in response to a variety of stress conditions, though their function remains unclear. "Canonical" SGs - caused by stressors like sodium arsenite - are dynamic and cytoprotective, allowing cells to evade cell death during periods of stress. Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is known to elicit a "non-canonical" SG subtype, lacking canonical SG components such as eukaryotic initiation factor 3 and polyadenylated mRNAs. The exact function of UV SGs, and the mechanisms driving their formation, remain unknown. Here we report the findings of a comparative analysis of UVA, UVB and UVC exposures on SG formation in three cell types: osteosarcoma (U2OS), keratinocytes (HaCaT), and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF). We observed that SG formation in response to UV is highly cell type dependent. UVB and UVC induce robust SG formation in U2OS cells. However, only UVC exposure induced modest SG formation in MEFs, and none of the wavelengths caused SGs in HaCaT. While UVC-induced SGs in U2OS cells appear to be cell cycle dependent and specific to G1, UVB induced SG formation regardless of cell cycle stage. We tested the hypothesis that oxidative stress triggered by UV may be driving UV SG formation, and that keratin may buffer this effect, by overexpressing keratin in U2OS. Interestingly, we found that keratin and antioxidant treatment efficiently suppressed arsenite-induced SGs but had no effect on UV SGs. Our work confirms that UV SG formation is cell type specific and is not driven by oxidative stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.