ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary dysfunction affects billions of individuals worldwide; however, the fundamental cellular and circuit properties that govern perineal motor control remain largely unknown, serving as a functional "black box". Here, we describe several methods that, when used in concert, characterise cellular, synaptic, and motor unit properties underlying the control of urination in adult mice. High-density electromyography combined with real-time cystometry were used to study external urethral sphincter (EUS) motor units, which follow a hierarchical ("onion skin") recruitment pattern during bladder filling. The transition to the voiding phase is marked by inhibition, followed by synchronised bursts. Furthermore, through concurrent recordings of ischiocavernosus (IC) muscles, the relationship between IC and EUS motor units could be studied to look for shared common inputs that could shed light on circuitry. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from retrogradely identified neurons revealed a fundamental biophysical divergence: urinary parasympathetic preganglionic neurons (PPGN) are significantly smaller and more excitable than somatic EUS and IC motoneurons and lack the recurrent excitatory and inhibitory circuits present in both EUS and IC motor pools. Finally, using a novel pressure-clamp preparation, we showed that acute tibial nerve stimulation (a widely used treatment for urinary dysfunction) evokes short-latency inhibition of EUS motor units. Collectively, these methods can be used to delineate patterns of motor unit recruitment, local recurrent microcircuit architecture, and distinct biophysical properties of the perineal motor system, providing mechanistic insights into urinary function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.