Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889790›Full record

ArticleAcademic pathology

Visualizing pathology: The development of a narrated video autopsy for medical students.

Constance Wraith, Michael Osborn, Karim Meeran, Amir H Sam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Constance WraithHistopathology Specialty Trainee and Quality Assurance Teaching Fellow at Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Michael OsbornConsultant Histopathologist for Northwest London Pathology, London, United Kingdom.
Karim MeeranSchool of Medicine at Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amir H SamSchool of Medicine at Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiencing an autopsy is a valuable educational tool for medical students, but declining autopsy numbers have made it increasingly rare for students to observe one. This report details the development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel, video-based autopsy teaching session at a large Medical School in London. In the session, a pre-recorded, narrated autopsy was shown to fifth-year medical students, along with interactive quizzes. The session, led by an experienced pathologist, aimed to enhance students' understanding of autopsy procedures. The effectiveness of the session was evaluated using pre- and post-session questionnaires on a Likert scale. Between 84 and 166 participants answered both the pre- and post-surveys for each statement. After the teaching session, significantly more students reported that observing an autopsy was helpful for their learning, they understood why a patient might undergo an autopsy, they knew what takes place during an autopsy, they appreciated why an autopsy might be important in a patient's care and they understood how correlating clinical history to autopsy findings can help clinicians establish a cause of death (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the number of students who would rather attend a video autopsy session than an in-person autopsy, if given the choice, also increased significantly (P < 0.001). The session allows large numbers of students to become more familiar with autopsy practice and its role in patient care during a single timetabled session. As autopsy numbers decline globally, this innovative approach could be adapted for other health professions and educational levels.

Indexed as

AutopsyPathologyTeachingUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41889790
PMCPMC13014929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.