ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Death literacy: Tensions between theory and practice.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Death literacy is a burgeoning field in palliative care research and the social sciences, exploring people's knowledge, skills, experiential learning and social action as these pertain to death and dying. Death literacy is not described or advocated in UK policy or guidelines explicitly, yet this essay shows that it is mentioned implicitly, and these implicit definitions and uses are explored. In this critical essay, the authors draw on a series of examples from UK-based policy and guidelines to describe the ways death literacy is implicitly articulated in the material. In doing so, the essay draws attention to the ways death literacy is understood in policy and guidelines, the ways death and talking about death are framed, and the ways that nuanced contextual accounts of death literacy are critical to developing this branch of study further. By looking at the ways death literacy is framed in policy through the lenses of time, taboo and how death is discussed (or not), this essay develops an account of the tensions and gaps between theory and practice. Recommendations to address these gaps include discussions centred on the timing of conversations about death and dying, and establishing a benchmark for what is discussed and constitutes 'death literacy' in public discourse. As such, the essay contributes to the growing body of literature on death literacy in the United Kingdom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.