ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026
Clinical and Haemodynamic Evaluation of a Novel Physician Modified Inner Branch Iliac Branch Device for East Asians.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on Clinical and Haemodynamic Evaluation of a Novel Physician Modified Inner Branch Iliac Branch Device for East Asians.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
- Commentary on: "clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of a novel physician modified inner branch iliac branch device for East Asians".EJVES vascular forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The anatomic suitability of the iliac branch device remains limited, particularly in East Asians, in whom the common iliac arteries (CIAs) are notably short. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and haemodynamic effects of the physician modified inner branch iliac branch device (PM-IIBD) via clinical outcomes and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Method: In this observational case series study, clinical safety was evaluated in ten patients treated with the PM-IIBD for internal iliac artery preservation. CFD analyses were performed before surgery and at 12 month follow up to compare haemodynamic changes in four CIA regions. CFD parameters included velocity, pressure, time averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), relative residence time, oscillatory shear index (OSI), energy loss, and flow distribution ratios. Results: Technical success was 100%, with no peri-operative or follow up adverse events. CFD revealed minimal changes in pressure and velocity after PM-IIBD implantation, with only a slight post-operative decrease in external iliac artery average velocity (0.51 ± 0.12 m/s Conclusion: Preliminary clinical and CFD analyses have demonstrated the efficacy and haemodynamic stability of the PM-IIBD. By reducing spatial demands on the CIA, the PM-IIBD expands anatomic suitability, offering a feasible solution for internal iliac artery preservation in East Asians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.