Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889671›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026

Effects of ICS + LABA Combination Therapy on Asthma Control: An Observational Study in Real-World Settings.

Ping Han, Lihua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ping HanDepartment of Pharmacy, Wuhan Hankou Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Wuhan Dongxihu District People's Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) remain the cornerstone of maintenance therapy in persistent asthma. Although multiple trials have demonstrated short-term efficacy, there is a lack of comprehensive, long-term data on the impact of ICS/LABA therapy on asthma control, exacerbation frequency, and pulmonary function in real-world clinical settings. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the effects of ICS/LABA therapy over a 24-month period in a real-world cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 237 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma treated at Wuhan Hankou Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Eligible participants had ≥12 months of documented ICS/LABA use. Patients were evaluated for asthma control using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), frequency of acute exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, pulmonary function (FEV Results: After 24 months, the proportion of patients achieving well-controlled asthma (ACT ≥20) increased significantly from 42.6% at baseline to 73.0% (P < 0.001). Mean FEV Conclusion: Continuous use of inhaled corticosteroids in combination with long-acting β-agonists was associated with sustained improvements in asthma control, enhanced lung function, and a reduction in the frequency of exacerbations. These findings support the continued use of ICS/LABA therapy as an effective and safe strategy for long-term asthma management in clinical practice.

Indexed as

asthmaasthma control testexacerbationinhaled corticosteroidslong-acting β2-agonistslong-term outcomeslung function

Identifiers

PMID41889671
PMCPMC13016119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.