ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Benefits of daily online plan adaptation with reduced margins in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for esophageal cancer requires large planning target volume (PTV) margins to account for interfraction variations, increasing radiation-associated side-effects. Cone-beam computed tomography-based (CBCT) online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) enables daily contour and plan adaptation, addressing anatomical changes and allowing for reduced PTV margins while ensuring target coverage. This study compared the dose-volume parameters of daily oART to non-adaptive IGRT in patients with esophageal cancer. Material and methods: Ten patients with distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (41.4 Gy/23 fractions) were included retrospectively. Daily IGRT CBCTs were used to emulate oART with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted target and organs-of-interest contouring, manual edits when necessary, and adaptive re-optimization. PTV margins (Anterior-Posterior, Left-Right, Caudal-Cranial) were reduced from 5, 7, 10 mm (IGRT) to 3, 5, 5 mm (oART), respectively. Mean organs-of-interest and fraction-equivalent (FE) dose-volume metrics between delivered and adaptive plans were compared. Results: Compared with IGRT, oART plans significantly reduced the number of fractions with internal clinical target volume underdosing (V Conclusion: CBCT-based oART improved dose distribution in esophageal cancer by enabling PTV margin reduction, improved target coverage and superior organs-of-interest sparing. These findings encourage clinical implementation to reduce radiation-associated side-effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.