ReviewJournal of rheumatic diseases2026
The current state of systemic lupus erythematosus care in the Philippines: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of rheumatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease of clinical importance in the Philippines. While its actual prevalence in the Philippines is unknown due to a lack of organized cohorts and community-level screening, Filipino females in the second and third decades of life are primarily affected, commonly presenting with mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, hematologic, and renal involvements. Several risk factors have been described as influencing the development of SLE in Filipinos, including molecular/genetic, clinical, lifestyle, and environmental factors. The diagnosis of SLE in the Philippines still relies on international standards, such as the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 and the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology 2019 classification criteria. Similarly, the lack of published local guidelines for SLE requires Filipino practitioners to rely on international management guidelines, which now include the Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the Asia-Pacific region, with management goals including the achievement of a low disease activity state, the prevention of organ damage, the prevention of flares, and the promotion of quality of life. Structural barriers still impede comprehensive lupus care in the country, manifesting as poor access to essential drugs and rheumatologists, low capacity for community-level surveillance, lacking research and guidelines in Philippine-specific nuances (i.e., common presentations and comorbidities such as tuberculosis), and education. The medical community in the country must be mobilized to ensure holistic care for SLE patients, as it is one of the most important rheumatologic conditions in the Philippines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.