ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Social network analysis of stakeholders in China's hierarchical medical system: toward a collaborative governance framework for enhanced integration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Hierarchical Medical System (HMS) in China aims to streamline healthcare delivery through structured patient referrals across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. However, the weak collaboration among stakeholders, such as government agencies, medical institutions, and patients has become a significant barrier to its effective implementation. Methods: This study employed Social Network Analysis (SNA) to explore the social network characteristics and functional positioning of key stakeholders in the HMS. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify 14 primary stakeholders, followed by a survey of 631 experts to assess the relationships between these stakeholders. The expert judgments were used to construct a relationship matrix, which served as the basis for network analysis. Results: Our findings revealed that stakeholder collaboration within the HMS operates as a moderately connected network, characterized by limited integration and low participation from both patients and primary healthcare institutions. This lack of engagement is a primary barrier to the effective implementation of the system. Among the core stakeholders, including the Health Committee, Finance Bureau, Development and Reform Commission, and Healthcare Security Administration, there was insufficient cohesion and coordination, which weakened the overall network. This lack of integration significantly hampers policy synergy and reduces implementation efficiency. Conclusions: A collaborative governance framework is proposed to address these challenges. By fostering greater engagement among stakeholders and empowering patients to voice their needs, the system can achieve better integration, equity, and responsiveness. This framework aims to improve system efficiency and policy implementation, facilitating more effective governance and better healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.