Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889605›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The role of community assets in tackling UK health inequalities through community engagement and partnerships in social prescribing.

Linda J M Thomson, Helen J Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Digital social prescribing: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda J M ThomsonCulture, Nature, and Health Research Group, UCL Arts and Sciences/UCL Biosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Helen J ChatterjeeCulture, Nature, and Health Research Group, UCL Arts and Sciences/UCL Biosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With policy focused on prevention and re-location of care into communities to reduce the burden on acute services, the need for robust evidence from social prescribing that integrates community assets into health and care systems is becoming increasingly vital. Methods: As part of a national multi-centered program of research, 'Mobilizing Community Assets to Tackle Health Inequalities', seven projects from across the UK participated in an online survey asking how their work involved social prescribing, successes and challenges, and tackling health inequalities. Survey data was supplemented with information from quarterly spreadsheets where projects recorded academic and creative outputs, events, partnerships, posts, ways of working, and audiences or communities. Results: Six themes: activities/interventions; audiences/communities; funding; methods; partners/stakeholders; and research aims/focus, with 62 subthemes were derived from the survey data. Responses showed that projects worked in the UK's most deprived areas delivering social prescribing focusing on the social determinants of health, and mapping community assets and pathways for underserved groups. Successes were attributed to link workers as knowledge brokers, and partnerships with primary and secondary care, and arts and community organizations in co-producing local interventions. Challenges such as variation in the flexibility of creative approaches and lack of knowledge about community assets were also attributed to link workers. Other challenges included accessibility, participant non-attendance, and funding issues. Discussion: To tackle health inequalities, projects used hyper-local, place-based approaches and co-design of interventions promoting cultural and green community assets, with link workers, people with lived experience, peer support workers and volunteers. The study proposes an approach to social prescribing that combines models of recovery and peer support underpinned by self-determination theory to improve social inclusion and quality of life. Recommendations include a consortium-based approach to person-centered care working closely with local populations and public health, where provision is co-located and co-delivered in conjunction with relevant data concerning health conditions and the wider social determinants to address the root causes of health inequalities.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Status DisparitiesSocial PrescribingHumansSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomcommunity assetshealth inequalitieslink workermental healthpartnershipspeer supportself-determination theorysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41889605
PMCPMC13013404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.