Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Role of spinal sensorimotor circuits in triphasic muscle command: a simulation approach using goal exploration process.

Daniel Cattaert, Matthieu Guemann, Florent Paclet, Luca Lemarchand, Bryce Chung, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Aymar de Rugy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel CattaertInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Matthieu GuemannInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Florent PacletInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Luca LemarchandInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Bryce ChungNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Pierre-Yves OudeyerInria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, Talence, France.
Aymar de RugyInstitut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine, UMR 5287, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During rapid voluntary elbow movement on horizontal plane, a stereotyped triphasic pattern is typically observed in the electromyograms (EMGs) of antagonistic muscles acting at this joint. To explain the origin of such triphasic commands, two types of theories have been proposed. Peripheral theories consider that triphasic commands result from sensorimotor spinal networks, either through a combination of reflexes or through a spinal central pattern generator. Central theories consider that the triphasic command is elaborated in the brain. Although both theories were partially supported by physiological data, there is still no consensus about how exactly triphasic commands are elaborated. Moreover, capacities of simple spinal sensorimotor circuits to elaborate triphasic commands on their own have not been tested yet. In order to test this, we modelled arm musculoskeletal system operating in the absence of gravity, muscle activation dynamics, proprioceptive spindle and Golgi afferent activities and spinal sensorimotor circuits. Step commands were designed to modify the activity of spinal neurons and the strength of their synapses, either to prepare (SET) the network before movement onset, or to launch the movement (GO). Since these step commands do not contain any dynamics, changes in muscle activities responsible for arm movement rest entirely upon interactions between the spinal network and the musculoskeletal system. Critically, we selected step commands using a Goal Exploration Process inspired from baby babbling during development. In this task, the Goal Exploration Process proved very efficient at discovering step commands that enabled spinal circuits to handle a broad spectrum of functional behaviors, displayed in a behavioral space characterized by movement amplitude and maximal speed. All over the behavioral space, specific SET and GO commands elicited natural triphasic commands, thereby substantiating the inherent capacity of the spinal network in generating them.

Indexed as

goal explorationmotor controlsensorimotor circuitsspinal circuitstriphasic pattern

Identifiers

PMID41889600
PMCPMC13015193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.