ArticleRSC advances2026
Industrial wastewater identification based on HPLC combined with data standardization and ensemble learning algorithms.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous development of industry, accidental or unauthorized discharges of wastewater from manufacturing enterprises have increasingly severe impacts on the environment. Rapid and accurate identification of industrial wastewater sources is of great significance for enhancing regulatory oversight and environmental protection. In this study, we propose a novel approach for discriminating the sources of industrial wastewater by integrating data standardization with ensemble learning. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is employed to collect wastewater samples. To ensure data consistency and accuracy, a local stretching alignment method combined with Gaussian fitting is introduced for precise peak alignment in chromatographic data. We compare the modeling performance of two ensemble learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). To further improve model accuracy, hyperparameter optimization is conducted using the Optuna framework. The models are systematically evaluated through five-fold cross-validation. Experimental results show that the optimized RF model achieves an average cross-validation accuracy of 97.87%, a test set accuracy of 98.28%, and an F1 score of 0.9799, the accuracy on the newly collected samples reached 95.08%, demonstrating excellent overall performance and a well-balanced trade-off between precision and recall. This approach provides an efficient and reliable analytical tool for tracing the sources of industrial wastewater.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.