Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889530›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2026

A case report on anti-adhesive spray related flame burn.

Yu Ting Tay, Sarah van Vuuren

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu Ting TayPlastic Surgery Department, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
Sarah van VuurenPlastic Surgery Department, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-adhesive sprays are commonly used in clinical practice to facilitate the removal of wound dressings. Despite their widespread use in hospital settings, the potential safety risks associated with these products have not been reported in the literature. We present the first documented case of a flame burn associated with the use of an anti-adhesive spray in a 32-year-old patient. This case highlights a previously unreported flammability hazard and underscores the importance of awareness when using aerosolised medical products in clinical environments.

Indexed as

Anti-adhesive sprayFlame burnFlammable aerosoliatrogenic burn injury

Identifiers

PMID41889530
PMCPMC13014653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.