ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Lower limb edema detection and grading classification using deep learning and image enhancement technologies.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower limb edema is a common clinical symptom closely associated with chronic diseases such as heart failure, liver disease, and renal dysfunction. Edema severity grading is an important indicator for clinical diagnosis and disease monitoring. However, traditional assessments that rely on visual inspection and manual palpation are subjective and inconsistent, making them insufficient to meet the requirements of standardized and precise diagnostics. Methods: This study proposes a multistage deep learning framework that integrates object detection and image classification for automatic detection and grading of lower limb edema. The system architecture initially employed YOLO models to detect indentation regions, followed by image enhancement techniques to improve the representation of edema features and enhance the detection accuracy. Finally, classification models were used to categorize edema severity. To address the data imbalance issue, random rotation was applied for data augmentation, and non-target regions were removed through automatic background elimination and cropping to enhance classification performance. Results: The experimental findings demonstrated that the proposed system achieved an average classification accuracy of 87~93% across different edema severity levels, 90-94% for recall rates, and 93~97% for precisions for different edema stages. These results validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the automatic detection and grading classification system for lower limb edema. Conclusion: The proposed system holds the potential for both clinical decision support and home-based self-care, enhancing the accuracy and consistency of edema assessment for patients and healthcare professionals. It can facilitate smart and precision medicine based on the status of lower limb edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.