Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026

Collapse and collision aware grasping for cluttered shelf picking.

Abhinav Pathak, Kalaichelvi Venkatesan, Tarek Taha, Rajkumar Muthusamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhinav Pathak *Robotics Lab, Dubai Future Labs, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Kalaichelvi VenkatesanBirla Institute of Technology and Science, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Tarek TahaRobotics Lab, Dubai Future Labs, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Rajkumar Muthusamy *Robotics Lab, Dubai Future Labs, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern smart factories, automated shelf picking must deliver high throughput, flexibility, and safe human-robot collaboration. In these environments, efficient and safe retrieval of stacked objects is a significant challenge due to complex spatial dependencies and structural inter-dependencies. Traditional vision-based methods excel at object localization but often lack the physical reasoning required to predict the consequences of extraction, leading to unintended collisions and collapses. This paper proposes a collapse and collision-aware grasp planner that integrates dynamic physics simulations for robotic decision-making. Using a single image and depth map, an approximate 3D representation of the scene is reconstructed in a simulation environment, enabling the robot to evaluate different retrieval strategies before execution. Two approaches: 1) heuristic-based and 2) physics-based are proposed for both single-box extraction and shelf clearance tasks. Extensive real-world experiments on structured and unstructured box stacks, along with validation using datasets from existing databases, show that our physics-aware method significantly improves efficiency and success rates compared to baseline heuristics. A video demonstrating the real-world implementation of our proposed system is available at: https://youtu.be/GBWMiNIHUlU.

Indexed as

collapse aware grasp planningindustrial automationrobotic manipulationshelf pickingwarehouse automation

Identifiers

PMID41889482
PMCPMC13012967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.