ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2026
Brain Tumor Imaging with Iopamidol CEST MRI: In Vivo Detection and Validation.
Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging from Macro to Nanoscale: Multimodal Advances in Chemical and Biomedical Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several diamagnetic CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) molecules have been proposed as a potential alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents (CAs), with promising contrast efficiency properties. However, a direct comparison of CEST contrast agents in brain tumors, where gadolinium CAs are considered the gold standard for detecting primary masses, is still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the capability of Iopamidol, a CT contrast medium, to detect and delineate brain tumors in mice using the MRI-CEST technique compared with a conventional gadolinium-based contrast agent. Iopamidol provided enough contrast enhancement to detect and delineate brain tumors in both postinjection and contrast-enhanced images, comparable to Gadoteridol, in a glioblastoma murine model obtained upon stereotaxic injection of GL261 cells into C57BL/6 mice. Quantitative comparison between tumor and healthy tissue was assessed with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and lesion-to-brain ratio (LBR) metrics. LBR values were 2.7-fold larger for Iopamidol than for Gadoteridol, although the CNR values were lower. The diagnostic accuracy of segmented tumor regions on both Iopamidol- and Gadoteridol-derived contrast images was calculated by the Tanimoto, DICE similarity, and volume similarity coefficients that indicated strong similarities between the contoured regions from Iopamidol and Gadoteridol contrast images. Moreover, moderate to excellent agreements were observed for intra- and interobserver variability. Overall, Iopamidol showed a capability similar to that of Gadoteridol to detect and contour the tumor area, with good diagnostic performance in terms of tumor border delineation in brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.