Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889470›Full record

ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2026

Brain Tumor Imaging with Iopamidol CEST MRI: In Vivo Detection and Validation.

Elena Botto, Antonella Carella, Francesco Gammaraccio, Daisy Villano, Riccardo Gambino, Alessia Corrado, Elisa Pirotta, Feriel Romdhane, Dario Livio Longo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena BottoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Antonella CarellaInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Francesco GammaraccioDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Nizza 52, Turin 10126, Italy.
Daisy VillanoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Nizza 52, Turin 10126, Italy.
Riccardo GambinoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Via Nizza 52, Turin 10126, Italy.
Alessia CorradoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Elisa PirottaInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Feriel RomdhaneInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Dario Livio LongoInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging (IBB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-9925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several diamagnetic CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) molecules have been proposed as a potential alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents (CAs), with promising contrast efficiency properties. However, a direct comparison of CEST contrast agents in brain tumors, where gadolinium CAs are considered the gold standard for detecting primary masses, is still lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the capability of Iopamidol, a CT contrast medium, to detect and delineate brain tumors in mice using the MRI-CEST technique compared with a conventional gadolinium-based contrast agent. Iopamidol provided enough contrast enhancement to detect and delineate brain tumors in both postinjection and contrast-enhanced images, comparable to Gadoteridol, in a glioblastoma murine model obtained upon stereotaxic injection of GL261 cells into C57BL/6 mice. Quantitative comparison between tumor and healthy tissue was assessed with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and lesion-to-brain ratio (LBR) metrics. LBR values were 2.7-fold larger for Iopamidol than for Gadoteridol, although the CNR values were lower. The diagnostic accuracy of segmented tumor regions on both Iopamidol- and Gadoteridol-derived contrast images was calculated by the Tanimoto, DICE similarity, and volume similarity coefficients that indicated strong similarities between the contoured regions from Iopamidol and Gadoteridol contrast images. Moreover, moderate to excellent agreements were observed for intra- and interobserver variability. Overall, Iopamidol showed a capability similar to that of Gadoteridol to detect and contour the tumor area, with good diagnostic performance in terms of tumor border delineation in brain tumors.

Indexed as

chemical exchange saturation transfergadoteridolglioblastomaiopamidolmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41889470
PMCPMC13014332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.