ArticleDigital health
When the therapist hallucinates: AI, psychedelics, and the risks of unsupervised digital mental health care.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining the Roles of Technology Across the Health Care Journey for Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As direct-to-consumer ketamine prescriptions obtained via telehealth in the United States, along with psychedelic support, proliferate, some patients are turning to general-purpose chatbots as de facto "therapists" in unmonitored settings. These AI-guided altered-state sessions carry significant ethical, clinical, and legal risks. Current AI tools are not licensed professionals, lack consistent reliability, and cannot provide emergency support. Combined with mind-altering drugs, their unpredictability can precipitate harm rather than relieve distress. The convergence of these innovations (psychedelic therapeutics and generative AI) creates an unregulated frontier in mental health care. Traditional safeguards in psychedelic therapy rely on "set and setting," a supportive mindset and environment guided by trained humans. When that role is replaced by AI, both are fundamentally disrupted. Clinicians should recognize that patients are already experimenting with AI in this way, often without disclosure or oversight. When screening for psychedelic use or discussing at-home treatment, providers should anticipate the risks of inadequate monitoring, unsafe crisis response, and blurred therapeutic boundaries with AI chatbots. Even if clinicians do not endorse or recommend AI tools, they may bear responsibility once patient use is known. Providers should therefore counsel patients about these dangers, document safety discussions, and routinely ask about AI use as part of risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.