ArticleSurgical oncology insight2026
Bridging the communication gap in foregut cancer: A qualitative exploration of patient and caregiver perspectives.
Article in Surgical oncology insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Effective communication between patients, caregivers and the healthcare team is essential in foregut cancer care, where treatment often involves complex, high-risk decisions. Despite its importance, patient and caregiver perspectives on communication remain underexplored, particularly in underserved populations. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators to communication from the perspectives of patients with foregut cancer and their caregivers. Study design: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews at a safety-net and tertiary care center in the Southeastern United States. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using inductive thematic and content analysis with NVivo 14 software. Intercoder agreement exceeded 90%. The study adhered to consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Results: Forty-five individuals (30 patients, 15 caregivers) participated. Four key communication barriers were identified: (1) information overload and lack of clarity, (2) lack of clear expectation setting regarding prognosis and treatment impact, (3) lack of acknowledgement of patient or caregiver concerns, and (4) perceived inconsistencies in communication among providers. Five facilitators were described: (1) clear explanations using accessible language, (2) written or visual materials, (3) feeling heard, (4) opportunities to voice personal goals and concerns, and (5) presentation of treatment options and alternatives. Conclusion: Patients with foregut cancer and their caregivers face significant communication challenges that may impact trust, decision-making and satisfaction. Clear, empathetic and consistent communication that integrates patient goals and clarifies expectations is crucial to enhance quality of care and support shared decision-making. Insights gained will inform strategies to enhance communication and improve patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.