ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Development and validation of an interpretable ensemble model for predicting androgen receptor status in triple-negative breast cancer: a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Reliable assessment of androgen receptor (AR) status in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is critical for targeted therapy but remains challenging due to biopsy limitations from intratumoral heterogeneity. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable ensemble model integrating radiomics and multiparametric MRI for noninvasive AR status prediction. Materials and methods: A total of 379 TNBC patients from three institutions were included for model training and external validation. All patients underwent preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from a Segment Anything Model-based segmentation tool and underwent multi-step selection. Multiparametric MRI features were evaluated using standardized criteria. Three predictive models, including a radiomics model, an MRI model, and an integrated ensemble model, were constructed using a stacking framework with Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Model performance was assessed by ROC analysis, calibration, and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied for interpretability. Results: The integrated model achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.891 in the training cohort), outperforming radiomics (AUC = 0.836) and MRI models (AUC = 0.753). External validation confirmed robustness (AUC = 0.863 and 0.818). The integrated model maintained high sensitivity (78-85%) and specificity (82-87%) across cohorts. SHAP analysis revealed radiomic descriptors, especially skewness and surface-to-volume ratio, as the most influential predictors. Conclusions: An interpretable ensemble model integrating radiomics and multiparametric MRI achieved robust and generalizable performance for AR status prediction in TNBC. This noninvasive approach may assist in patient stratification for AR-targeted therapy and support personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.