Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41889287›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2026

Deep Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Jiguang Li, Robert Gibbons, Veronika Ročková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiguang LiEconometrics and Statistics, https://ror.org/024mw5h28The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4744-0023
Robert GibbonsDepartment of Statistics, https://ror.org/024mw5h28The University of Chicago, USA.
Veronika RočkováEconometrics and Statistics, https://ror.org/024mw5h28The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, USA.

Funding

NIA NIH HHS NIA-R56 AG084070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) play a crucial role in educational assessment and diagnostic screening in behavioral health. Unlike traditional linear tests that administer a fixed set of pre-assembled items, CATs adaptively tailor the test to an examinee's latent trait level based on their previous responses. We introduce a novel CAT system that builds on recent advances in Bayesian multivariate IRT. Our approach leverages direct sampling from the latent factor posterior distributions, significantly accelerating existing information-theoretic item-selection methods by eliminating the need for computationally intensive Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. To address the potential suboptimality of one-step-ahead item-selection rules, we also develop a double deep Q-learning algorithm that efficiently learns an optimal item-selection policy offline using a calibrated item bank. Through simulation and real-data studies, we demonstrate that our approach not only accelerates existing item-selection methods but also highlights the potential of reinforcement learning (RL) in CATs. Notably, our Q-learning-based strategy consistently achieves the fastest posterior variance reduction, leading to earlier test termination. These results demonstrate the promise of combining exact posterior sampling with RL to deliver scalable, high-precision CATs.

Indexed as

adaptive data collectionBayesian methodsdeep Q-learningmultidimensional item response theory

Identifiers

PMID41889287
PMCPMC13274932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.