ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026
Serum free light chain concentration and ratio-based criterion for myeloma-defining event, in its current version, is untenable.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision-making based on myeloma-defining event criteria using thresholds for involved serum free light chain level of 10 mg/dL and ratio of involved to uninvolved light chain of >100 is a poor indicator for the risk of progression to multiple myeloma. Poor performance of this criterion can be attributed to (a) methodological flaws in the publication on which the light chain level and ratio figures are based, (b) failure to apply light chain type-specific criteria for kappa and lambda chain-associated lesions, (c) 'drift' in the antibody reactivity for free kappa light chains resulting in higher values in more recent testing, (d) lack of high-sensitivity imaging in earlier studies resulting in inclusion of patients with occult multiple myeloma, and (e) evidence from newer studies showing much lower risk of progression to myeloma than presented initially. The light chain level and ratio-based criterion for myeloma-defining event, in its current form, ought to be removed from the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines. The criterion should be revised by collection of prospective data from multiple institutions using standardized patient selection criteria with emphasis on high-sensitivity imaging studies to exclude occult multiple myeloma patients, subgrouping patients by intact immunoglobulin smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM); light chain SMM; heavy chain and light chain type of lesion; and application of light chain type-specific levels per gram of monoclonal immunoglobulin, measuring monoclonal light chains. Both static and dynamic measures should be collected, followed by rigorous statistical analysis to identify parameters predicting risk of progression to multiple myeloma in 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.