ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Acute effects of percussion massage therapy on balance, functional performance, and pain in adolescent cyclists: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07206576 (Acute Effects of Percussion Massage Therapy on Balance, Explosive Power, and Functional Performance in Adolescent Cyclists), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Effects of Percussion Massage Therapy on Balance, Explosive Power, and Functional Performance in Adolescent Cyclists: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercussion massage therapy (PMT) is increasingly used in sport as a warm-up and recovery tool, yet its acute effects on neuromuscular performance in youth athletes are unclear. This study examined whether a single PMT session is associated with short-term changes in dynamic balance, functional performance and pain in adolescent cyclists.
methodsIn this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 32 licensed cyclists aged 12–15 years were allocated to a PMT group (n = 16) or control group (n = 16). PMT was delivered bilaterally to the gluteus maximus, quadriceps femoris, and gastrocnemius muscles using a handheld percussive device (Compex® Fixx™ 2.0; 41.7 Hz) for a total of 18 min, while controls rested for an equivalent period. Outcomes were assessed pre- and immediately post-intervention and included Y Balance Test (YBT) composite score, Triple Hop Test distance, isometric lower-limb strength (handheld dynamometry), and lower-limb pain (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS).
resultsCompared with controls, the PMT group showed significantly greater improvements in YBT composite scores (dominant limb: p = 0.015, d = 0.91; non-dominant: p = 0.016, d = 0.90). Within-group improvements were observed in Triple Hop Test distance in the PMT group; however, post-intervention between-group differences were not consistently observed across all outcomes. Isometric strength of the gastrocnemius, quadriceps femoris, and gluteus maximus did not change significantly in either group (all p > 0.05). NRS scores decreased markedly after PMT (within-group d = − 2.18), with change scores favoring PMT over control (p < 0.001, d = − 1.33).
conclusionsA single PMT session was associated with short-term improvements in dynamic balance, selected aspects of functional performance, and pain perception in adolescent cyclists, without altering maximal isometric strength. These findings should be interpreted as acute and exploratory, suggesting that PMT may serve as a complementary pre-activity modality primarily through short-term neuromuscular and pain-modulating mechanisms rather than definitive performance enhancement.
trial registrationProspectively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT07206576) on 26/09/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.