ArticleGlobalization and health2026
Canadian mines, global issues: examining health impacts, demanding action.
Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile a global player in the mining and metals sector, there is little regulatory oversight by Canada of Canadian mining companies in relation to their transnational activities. Much mineral exploration and mining take place in remote and rural areas inhabited by Indigenous and other minoritized and/or marginalized communities, and has been linked to worsening health, social, and environmental conditions. Few effective legal mechanisms exist to monitor, investigate, and provide effective remedies for their harmful impacts.
methodsThree focal mining communities representing different mining life stages were studied: exploratory phase (Philippines), midlife (Brazil), and a transitioning to end-stage that has now been reinvigorated post-nationalization (Kyrgyz Republic). A qualitative approach based on locale-specific community consultations was employed with analysis informed by a theoretical framework based on the commercial, political, and social determinants of health, environmental justice, and their interactive and embodied impacts. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The community consultations yielded the following notable findings: a failure to acknowledge Indigenous rights (all sites); intimidation and harassment of local residents raising objections (Brazil and Philippines); the centrality of mines entrench social and economic inequities —including pre-existing ones (all sites); prior experience and knowledge of harms linked to extractive resource industries affect perception and resistance to mines (Brazil and Philippines) and the presence of widespread illness and disease among miners (Brazil and Kyrgyz Republic). Participants expressed support for community-driven mining and health studies documenting long-term occupational and environmental health impacts, particularly respiratory and water-borne illnesses.
conclusionsDespite the lethargy, obfuscation, and refusal of the Canadian government to take action on the global interests and actions of its corporations operating abroad, local efforts to resist the experienced and potential harms of transnational Canadian mining operations are noteworthy. Canada must comply with its binding international human rights obligations and move beyond its failed policy approach to addressing the harmful impacts of these endeavours. Future research must be conducted with and be accountable to local communities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.