Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888911›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2026

Self-managed medical abortion in Nigeria: a prospective, comparative study of clinical outcomes for a misoprostol-alone regimen obtained from patent medicine vendors compared to clinics.

Kristen M Shellenberg, Simone Storey, Risa Griffin, Nkiruka Okwesa, Ayodeji Oginni, Babtunde Adelekan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04242212 (A Prospective, Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes Following Clinic-based Versus Self-use of Medication Abortion Using a Misoprostol-only Regimen), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04242212 unknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes Following Clinic-based Versus Self-use of Medication Abortion Using a Misoprostol-only Regimen

TypeobservationalSponsorIpasRan2019 to 2020Enrolled4,000ConditionsInduced Abortion, First Trimester AbortionArmsMisoprostol sourced from clinics, Misoprostol sourced from PMVs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen M ShellenbergIpas, North Carolina, United States. shellenbergk@ipas.org.
Simone StoreyUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Risa GriffinContributions while Employed at Ipas, Chapel Hill, United States.
Nkiruka OkwesaContributions while Employed at Ipas, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ayodeji OginniContributions while Employed at Ipas, Abuja, Nigeria.
Babtunde AdelekanContributions while Employed at Ipas, Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnsafe abortion is a major public health issue in Nigeria, where high unmet need for contraception and restrictive abortion laws in the Northern and Southern parts of the country result in many abortions occurring outside the formal healthcare system and often under unsafe conditions. Given the high demand for abortion services and barriers to formal care in Nigeria, it is valuable to understand how and where women access medical abortion and if their clinical outcomes differ across these settings. This study aimed to determine whether important clinical outcomes differ among women who access misoprostol alone from a patent medicine vendor (PMV) when compared with those who access it from a clinic.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, non-inferiority cohort study of women aged 15-49 accessing a misoprostol-alone regimen from clinics and PMVs in three states of Nigeria. The primary outcome of interest was additional treatment to complete the abortion within 30 days of using misoprostol. We computed crude and adjusted risk differences in outcomes by group (clinic versus PMV), and if the 95% confidence intervals on the crude and adjusted risk differences did not cross the non-inferiority limit of 4%, we considered PMVs non-inferior to clinics in terms of additional treatment to complete the abortion. Women were recruited at the point of accessing misoprostol at a clinic or PMV. Follow-up by telephone to confirm pill use and assess clinical outcomes was done at three to seven days, 10-29 days, and 30-45 days after taking misoprostol.

resultsOver 11 months, we enrolled 1835 women, and complete data were available from 1572 women (824 from clinics and 748 from PMVs). The rate of additional treatment to complete the abortion was non-inferior for the PMV group (3.6%) compared with the clinic cohort (9.5%), with an adjusted risk difference of -6.2% (95% CI-12.4%- 0.1%). Although a small proportion of women in each cohort (<8%) reported visiting a health care professional after taking misoprostol, no complications were reported. Most women felt prepared for what would happen after the misoprostol (92% of both cohorts) and would recommend medical abortion to a friend (89% of the clinic cohort and 90% of the PMV cohort).

conclusionsSelf-managed abortion with misoprostol alone from PMVs was comparable in safety, effectiveness, and acceptability to clinic-based care, in line with global evidence supporting self-management of abortion care.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04242212.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortion, InducedMisoprostolNonprescription DrugsAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNigeriaPregnancyProspective StudiesSelf AdministrationYoung AdultAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMisoprostolNonprescription DrugsAbortionAbortion pillsClinicsMedical abortionMedication abortionMisoprostolMisoprostol aloneNigeriaPatent medicine vendorsPharmacy

Identifiers

PMID41888911
PMCPMC13141361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.