Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888909›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2026

Network analysis predicts pembrolizumab response in advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 < 50.

Mario Occhipinti, Antonella Cruoglio, Silvia Marchesi, Arsela Prelaj, Marco Petrilli, Aurelia Rughetti, Paolo Ambrosini, Elisabetta Ferretti, Claudia Proto, Monica Ganzinelli and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03447678 (Phase II Study to Test Pembrolizumab), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03447678 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Phase II Study to Test Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in First Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC Patients With PD-L1 Low Tumors (<50%)_ PEOPLE TRIAL (Pembrolizumab in Pd-L1 Low Expressors).

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled65ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)ArmsPembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mario Occhipinti *Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. mario.occhipinti@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Antonella Cruoglio *MSc Degree Program In Data Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia MarchesiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Arsela PrelajMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marco PetrilliMSc Degree Program In Statistical Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Aurelia RughettiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo AmbrosiniMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta FerrettiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Claudia ProtoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Monica GanzinelliMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marta BrambillaMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Laura MazzeoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Teresa BeninatoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Filippo de BraudMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marina Chiara GarassinoThoracic Oncology Program, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Lorenzo FarinaDepartment of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Lo Russo *Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Manuela Petti *Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Merck Sharp and Dohme Italia IIS52278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) < 50% remains variable. Network analysis is promising in addressing tumor biology and behavior, potentially predicting therapeutic response.

methodsThis study, based on the PEOPLE trial (NCT03447678) data, explores network analysis for predictive biomarker discovery in immunotherapy response. Utilizing circulating immune profiling (CIP) and gene expression profiling (GEP), key immune cells and gene interactions were identified.

resultsOur findings confirm the central role of natural killer (NK) cells, with elevated baseline levels associated with a favorable response. Differential co-expression network (DCN) analysis of GEP identified 23 hub genes, with enrichment analysis linking CD48 to immune-related processes. Patient similarity network (PSN) analysis identified two patient clusters with significantly different survival outcomes. The integrated model outperformed single-layer approaches, supporting the added value of combining GEP and CIP data.

conclusionsDespite limitations such as a non-randomized design and small sample size, the study’s innovative network approach provides valuable insights. The results suggest that baseline NK cell subsets and specific gene evaluations could guide personalized treatment strategies, optimizing the use of pembrolizumab in aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS < 50%.

Indexed as

BiomarkersData integrationDifferential co-expression networkNetwork analysisNSCLCPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID41888909
PMCPMC13147633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.