ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026
Development of a vasopressor control module for testing hemorrhagic shock resuscitation controllers.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Controller Logics for Automating Vasopressor Administration Using a Hardware-in-Loop Test Platform.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients in hemorrhagic shock who are unresponsive to fluid administration can potentially benefit from and may even require vasopressor therapy. However, manual vasopressor titration in mass casualty or resource-limited settings can be arduous, increasing the risk of under- or over-treatment. Closed-loop vasopressor adaptive resuscitation controllers (V-ARCs) offer a potential solution, but their development is hindered when the iterative tuning and design process is primarily dependent on large-scale animal studies. To solve this problem, we developed a Vasopressor Control Module (VCM) for a hardware-in-loop automated testbed for resuscitation controllers (HATRC) to enable the systematic evaluation of V-ARCs. METHODS AND
resultsThe VCM's design was informed by vasopressor administration data captured in a hemorrhagic shock swine model, which revealed four key physiological variables that defined the hemodynamic response to vasopressor infusion: lag time, real response, overshoot, and pressure-time responsiveness. The incorporation of these variables enabled the VCM to replicate physiological variability, dose-dependent responsiveness, and disturbance conditions representative of the clinical setting. Proof-of-concept testing was achieved by comparing multiple V-ARC designs under different testing conditions and successfully differentiating their performance.
conclusionsThis work establishes a flexible, physiologically grounded platform for vasopressor controller development, reducing dependence on animal testing while enabling rapid and robust controller evaluation. Future work will expand physiological modeling, incorporate additional hemodynamic variables, and support multiagent resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.