Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888867›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026

Microbially driven methane and sulfur cycling processes and coupling mechanisms in mangrove sediments.

Mei Tao, Yijun Fan, Lu Qian, Huanping Liu, Yuzhen Ming, Xiaoli Yu, Kun Wu, Mingyang Niu, Qingyun Yan, Xiaohong Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mei TaoCollege of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yijun FanMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Lu QianMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Huanping LiuMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Yuzhen MingMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Xiaoli YuMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Kun WuMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Mingyang NiuMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Qingyun YanMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China.
Xiaohong HuangCollege of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Zhili HeMarine Synthetic Ecology Research Center, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 519082, China. hezhili@sml-zhuhai.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021M703751Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2024A1515010931National Natural Science Foundation of China 42430707, 52070196, 32370113 and 92251306Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) SML2023SP205, SML2024SP002, SML2024SP022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethane (CH

resultsOur results showed that Methanomicrobiales and Methanophagales were predominant methanogens, Methanospirareceae was a representative of anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME), and Desulfobacteraceae and Desulfobulbaceae were abundant sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), while Ectothiorhodospiraceae, Chromatiaceae and Comamonadaceae were dominant S-oxidizers. Correlation network analysis revealed positive interactions among methanogens, ANME and SRB. Also, metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) analysis indicated interspecies hydrogen transfer and extracellular electron exchange via conductive pili, flagella, and cytochromes were potential coupling mechanisms between methanogens and SRB. ANME could form consortia with SRB by intermediate metabolites (e.g., acetate) and/or direct interspecies electron transfer (e.g., flagella, pili, cytochromes). Furthermore, methanogen MAGs encoded thiosulfate oxidation and partial sulfate reduction pathways, while the ANME MAGs possessed potentials for S disproportionation and incomplete sulfate reduction. Additionally, SO

conclusionThis study provides novel insights into coupling mechanisms of CH

Indexed as

Coupling mechanismMangrove sedimentMethane/sulfur cyclingMethanogen and methanotrophSulfate-reducing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID41888867
PMCPMC13147674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.