Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888847›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Staff perceptions of patient self-care in hemodialysis treatment tasks: a qualitative exploration using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment Framework.

Chava Kurtz, Efrat Shadmi, Etty Kruzel-Davila, Alon Antebi, Tatyana Tsehovsky, Sivan Spitzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chava KurtzGalilee Medical Center, 89 Nahariya-Cabri, POB 21, Nahariyya, ZIP 2210001, Israel. chava.kurtz@biu.ac.il.
Efrat ShadmiThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., POB 3338, Mount Carmel, Haifa, ZIP 3103301, Israel.
Etty Kruzel-DavilaGalilee Medical Center, 89 Nahariya-Cabri, POB 21, Nahariyya, ZIP 2210001, Israel.
Alon AntebiFresenius Medical Care, 4 HaSheizaf, Raanana, ZIP 4366411, Israel.
Tatyana TsehovskyEdith Wolfson Medical Center, 62 Ha-Lokhamim St, Holon, ZIP 5822012, Israel.
Sivan SpitzerAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, 8 Henrietta Szold St, Safed, ZIP 1311502, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with end stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis typically receive treatment in-center, where tasks are mainly performed by healthcare providers with limited patient participation. Incorporating patient participation in performing at least some of the haemodialysis care tasks can enhance safety, efficiency, and quality, yet is rarely performed. Implementing change requires a comprehensive strategy, addressing both patient and provider organizational factors. Using the Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we examined the factors that may affect a change in the delivery of haemodialysis care and identified potential barriers and facilitators to shifting care provision from a provider-dominant model to a more participatory shared-care approach.

methodsIndividual semi-structured interviews with managers and staff were conducted to understand their perceptions and insights of patient participation in treatment care tasks in haemodialysis. The interview guide focused on inner context and was built based on the EPIS framework of inner context constructs. Data was analysed with the aid of Atlas.ti using a combination of inductive and deductive approaches to map themes and sub-themes into the EPIS constructs.

resultsA total of 36 interviews were conducted in two hospital- and two community-based units with nurses, physicians and managerial personnel. Results are presented according to EPIS constructs, highlighting more barriers than facilitators for implementing patient-shared care. As safety, quality of care, and patient satisfaction were found to be essential aspects of care in all units, implementing increased patient participation requires safety measures, staff education on new nursing approaches, and clear responsibility definitions. Unit settings differed in regulations and protocols.

conclusionsUsing EPIS, we identified drivers of implementation success for increasing patient participation in in-center haemodialysis care. These findings are key to inform the design of impactful, scalable, and sustainable programs. Different haemodialysis settings, with varying organizational structures and climate, prioritize patient participation differently. While all units aim for high-quality, efficient, and safe care, the differences in organizational structure and individual adopter characteristics would require significantly different approaches during planning and implementation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelKidney Failure, ChronicPatient ParticipationRenal DialysisSelf CareFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchBarriers and facilitatorsEPIS frameworkHaemodialysisSelf-careShared care

Identifiers

PMID41888847
PMCPMC13147843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.