ArticleBMC medical education2026
Empathy dimensions and patient-centered care during dental training: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmpathy is a core component of patient-centered clinical care and plays an important role in communication quality and clinician–patient interactions. Evidence on how specific empathy dimensions are distributed across different stages of dental education remains limited, particularly when total empathy scores are considered alone.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 358 undergraduate dental students enrolled in the first and fifth years of training. Empathy was assessed using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy–Student Version (JSPE-S), which comprises the Perspective Taking, Compassionate Care, and Standing in the Patient’s Shoes subscales. Sociodemographic and educational variables were recorded. Group comparisons and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations between year of study and empathy subscale scores.
resultsTotal JSPE-S scores did not differ significantly between first- and fifth-year students. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the Perspective Taking subscale. In contrast, Compassionate Care scores were lower among fifth-year students, whereas Standing in the Patient’s Shoes scores were higher. In adjusted analyses, year of study remained independently associated with these two empathy subdimensions after controlling for age, sex, income level, prior empathy-related education and previous communication training.
conclusionsOverall empathy levels were comparable across stages of dental education; however, specific empathy dimensions differed by year of study. These findings highlight the value of examining empathy as a multidimensional construct and suggest that reliance on total empathy scores alone may overlook meaningful variation in empathic orientation during dental training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.