ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
The complexity of inequity: rethinking global health through lived experience, power, and structural vulnerability.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health’s persistent inequities reflect not just gaps in resources or care, but the operation of complex, multi-level systems that inscribe power, vulnerability, and embodied experience. Prevailing frameworks remain too narrow, neglecting how health emerges from intersecting histories, adaptive institutions, and the lived experience of marginalized populations. This perspective advances a complexity-informed rethinking of inequity, integrating insights from structural vulnerability, epistemic justice, intersectionality, and the capability approach to illuminate how reductionist solutions overlook system dynamics and relational harms. By bridging data and narrative, and grounding analysis in both structural critique and lived experience, this work reframes inequity as emergent and fundamentally political. Case examples from maternal health and HIV stigma illustrate how structural arrangements and social meanings contour health in context-dependent ways. The implication is clear: achieving equity requires methodological humility, ethical rigor, and governance reforms that redistribute not only resources, but also epistemic authority and institutional power. This perspective offers an integrated conceptual architecture and calls for actionable transformation reorienting global health toward solidarity, partnership, and justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.