SynthesisBMC health services research2026
COVID-19's disruptions to cancer care pathways and widening of health inequalities in the UK: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring performance in cancer services during COVID-19 and beyond: a novel case throughput metric using NHS Cancer Waiting Times data.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted cancer care services in the United Kingdom (UK), potentially exacerbating pre-existing health inequalities. While emerging studies have documented service disruptions, a comprehensive synthesis of how these disruptions have widened disparities remains absent. This systematic review examines the extent to which the pandemic disrupted the cancer care pathway and intensified existing disparities across the UK, identifying key sociodemographic and geographical factors influencing access to services.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted for studies published between January 2020 and October 2024. Eligible studies included observational and empirical research examining disparities in cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the corresponding mitigation strategies. Data extraction followed a structured approach using a custom-developed extraction form designed for this review. Study quality was appraised using a bespoke scoring system, classifying studies as high, moderate, or low importance. Narrative synthesis, following the framework outlined by Popay et al., was then employed to identify key themes and explore relationships between findings.
results30 out of 457 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review found that socioeconomic status (SES) emerged as the most significant determinant, with individuals from deprived areas experiencing greater barriers to screening, urgent referrals, and treatment access, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Ethnic minorities, particularly Black patients, faced disproportionate reductions in hospital admissions and cancer screening participation. Age-related disparities were also evident, as older adults maintained higher screening rates but faced greater COVID-19 risks, while younger adults from lower-income backgrounds encountered delays in diagnosis and treatment.
conclusionsThe review highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities in UK cancer care, with SES, ethnicity, and age emerging as key determinants. Targeted interventions are essential, including the establishment of COVID-free “cold sites”, deployment of mobile screening units, and culturally tailored outreach programmes for ethnic minority communities. Strengthening regional healthcare capacity and conducting longitudinal assessments will be crucial in addressing disparities and ensuring equitable cancer care. Future research should focus on the long-term consequences of these disruptions on cancer outcomes and healthcare resilience. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO under the ID CRD42024602280.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.