Trial reportInternational journal for equity in health2026
Implementation of WHO-PEN interventions in Eswatini: an assessment of health equity and out-of-pocket expenditure for diabetes and hypertension care.
Trial report in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04183413 (Strengthening Primary Healthcare Delivery for Diabetes and Hypertension in Eswatini), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strengthening Primary Healthcare Delivery for Diabetes and Hypertension in Eswatini: A Cluster-randomized Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe rolled out the WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease (WHO-PEN) interventions at primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in Eswatini to increase care uptake for diabetes and hypertension. This study assesses the impact of WHO-PEN interventions on health equity and clients’ out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures.
methodsWe conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial with two intervention arms and one control arm among adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes, hypertension, or prediabetes. The intervention arms comprised Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD), which implemented facility- and community-based strategies to streamline care, and Community Delivery Platforms (CDP), which provided monthly outreach services; the control arm delivered the nurse-led standard of care (SoC). We assessed the cascade of care across socioeconomic groups to examine potential inequities. Out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures were disaggregated into four categories - transport, food, consultation fees, and medication - to identify the primary cost drivers for accessing care at primary healthcare clinics.
resultsAccess to healthcare for diabetes and hypertension was largely independent of socioeconomic status, with the exception of a difference in blood pressure measurement between the poorest and richest quintiles in the DSD arm. Participants in the DSD arm incurred lower total expenditures for a primary healthcare visit compared to those in the SoC and CDP arms, including lower transport costs. Transport was the largest component of OOP spending, and total direct expenditures per visit ranged from USD 2.65 to USD 3.96.
conclusionWHO-PEN interventions had a limited impact on health equity in Eswatini. The DSD model can potentially reduce out-of-pocket health expenses for participants, but further research is needed to address implementation challenges and to evaluate each DSD model’s distinct impact on care delivery.
trial registrationUS Clinical Trials Registry. NCT04183413. Trial registration date December 3, 2019. https://ichgcp.net/clinicaltrialsregistry/NCT04183413 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.