ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2026
Climate change and tuberculosis: enhancing impact through an implementation science informed agenda.
Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change increasingly threatens progress in tuberculosis (TB) control by exacerbating food insecurity, disrupting health systems, and driving population displacement, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Although a growing body of literature links climate stressors to adverse TB outcomes, most existing research remains descriptive and provides limited guidance on how TB programs can adapt service delivery under worsening environmental conditions. This review examines how implementation science can address this evidence-to-practice gap and advance a climate-adaptive TB agenda. Drawing on the recently published World Health Organization's Climate Change and Tuberculosis Analytical Framework, we synthesize evidence on key climate-related pathways affecting TB vulnerability and highlight persistent gaps in data on the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of adaptive interventions. We describe how implementation science frameworks and methods, including stakeholder-engaged approaches, mixed methods research, and evaluation of implementation outcomes, can guide the design, evaluation, and scale-up of climate-adaptive strategies. We conclude that embedding implementation science within climate-TB research is essential to move beyond documenting climate impacts toward actionable, equitable, and sustainable public health solutions, and to support resilient TB programs in the context of accelerating climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.