ArticleBMC public health2026
Stepping outside the clinic walls: health professionals' encounters with place during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimWhile existing literature has largely examined healthcare delivery within hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study extends the inquiry to the spatial dimensions of public health work in urban settings. It explores the experiences of health professionals engaged in home-based contact tracing in Türkiye, focusing on their perceptions of social determinants of health through place.
methodsSemi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 45 health professionals from socioeconomically diverse districts in Istanbul, between July 2021 and September 2022. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with particular attention to the role of place.
resultsHealth professionals observed a range of administrative, social, economic, cultural, and environmental challenges across households and neighborhoods they visited. Three key themes were identified: challenges in navigating the city (urban barriers and contrasting levels of urban development), perceived administrative neglect of place (time-pressured, place-ignorant planning and unregistered places), and places unsettling medical practice (socioeconomically deprived households and perceived limits of biomedicine in sociocultural contexts). These findings illustrate how place influenced health professionals’ experiences and highlight the underappreciation of place as a crucial social determinant of health.
conclusionsThis study underscores the role of place in shaping health professionals’ perceptions of social determinants of health during COVID-19 contact tracing in Türkiye. As their awareness of health inequalities increased, health professionals experienced moral distress arising from tensions between biomedical training and complex, non-medical needs. While socioeconomic constraints were often interpreted sympathetically, sociocultural factors were more frequently moralized, pointing to gaps in cultural competence. Taken together, these findings demonstrate how place-based public health work reveals the limits of a purely biomedical approach and underscore the importance of systematically integrating health professionals’ experiential knowledge into place-sensitive, culturally competent, biosocial approaches to health policy and practice during emergencies and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.