ArticleBMC public health2026
HOme-based self-sampling for cervical cancer prevention education among women living with HIV in Ghana (HOPE-inG): study protocol for a cluster-randomized type 2 hybrid effectiveness implementation trial.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06800664 (The Impact of an Evidence-Based, Behavioral Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention Among Women Living With HIV in Ghana), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of an Evidence-Based, Behavioral Cervical Cancer Screening Intervention Among Women Living With HIV in Ghana (HOPE-inG): A Type 2 Hybrid Effectiveness Implementation Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen living with HIV (WLWH) are six times more likely to develop cervical cancer (CC) than women without HIV, underscoring the urgent need for early and frequent screening. In Ghana, however, screening uptake among WLWH remains critically low and no national screening program exists. The HOPE (HOme-based self-sampling Prevention Education) toolkit has proven effective in increasing screening uptake. HOPE-inG (HOPE 2.0 in Ghana) aims to adapt the HOPE toolkits and develop implementation support strategies (ISS) to enhance the uptake and sustainment of cervical screening within HIV care services.
methodsThis study will be conducted in four HIV clinics in Ghana's Central Region using a three-phase design. Preparation Phase (Year 1): Use mixed methods, including nominal group techniques with 40-60 stakeholders (WLWH, healthcare providers, policymakers), to prioritize ISS and refine HOPE into HOPE 2.0 or HOPE-inG. Implementation Phase (Years 2-3): Conduct a hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing HOPE 2.0 + ISS (intervention group) versus HOPE 2.0 alone (control group). A total of 1,152 WLWH and 80 health providers will be enrolled. Sustainment Phase (Years 3-5): Evaluate the long-term sustainment of HOPE 2.0 and ISS using quantitative and qualitative methods. Primary outcomes include patient-level screening and treatment uptake (effectiveness) and provider-level implementation metrics (adoption, cost, fidelity, penetration and sustainability). Data sources include surveys, interviews, electronic tracking and fidelity checklists at multiple organizational levels. Cost analyses will employ micro-costing methods, and fidelity will be monitored through structured observations and log sheets. DISCUSSION: HOPE-inG is designed to develop scalable, sustainable strategies for improving cervical screening and care among WLWH in Ghana. By embedding evidence-based screening tools within HIV care services and supporting providers with targeted ISS, this study seeks to bridge critical gaps in cervical cancer prevention. Findings will provide evidence to inform national policy and guide the broader implementation of patient-driven and community-based screening programs in other low-resource settings, ultimately improving health outcomes and reducing disparities for WLWH.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06800664. Registered on 29 January 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.