Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41888747›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Prevalence, associated factors and geospatial patterns of HIV drug resistance in South Africa among the virally unsuppressed adults: updated results from the 2017 national HIV household survey.

Mpho Seleka, Neo Ledibane, Tholang Mokhele, Khangelani Zuma, Sizulu Moyo, Sean Jooste, Alfred Musekiwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mpho SelekaSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. mphoslk@gmail.com.
Neo LedibaneSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tholang MokheleHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Khangelani ZumaHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Sizulu MoyoHuman Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sean JoosteHuman Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alfred MusekiwaSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa bears the highest HIV burden globally, with substantial antiretroviral therapy (ART) scale-up. HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) threatens progress toward UNAIDS 95–95-95 targets. We assessed national HIVDR prevalence and associated factors among virally unsuppressed adults in 2017, before dolutegravir (DTG)-rollout.

methodsSecondary analysis of the 2017 national HIV household survey, included 1 253 virally unsuppressed (defined as ≥ 1 000 copies/mL) adults (≥ 15 years) with HIVDR results. Survey-weighted analysis generated nationally representative estimates. Weighted multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with HIVDR by treatment status. Province-stratified analyses examined sub-national disparities.

resultsNationally, the study found high viral non-suppression estimated at 37.8% (95%CI: 35.2 to 40.2), and overall HIVDR prevalence of 26.3% (95%CI: 22.5 to 30.5; n = 369), driven predominantly by efavirenz-associated NNRTI resistance (14.0%). Prevalence was highest in Eastern Cape (36.6%) and rural farms (35.0%); provincial variation was not statistically significant. Stratified analysis revealed HIVDR concentration among divorced individuals (75.0%, 95% CI: 41.7–92.6) and those with high stigma (19.9%, 95% CI: 13.3–28.7) in Eastern Cape, whereas North West showed consistently low prevalence. HIVDR was higher among ARV-positive (43.3%) vs. ARV-negative individuals (21.1%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.44, 95% CI: 2.78–7.10, p < 0.001). In EFV-negative subgroup, the strongest risk factor was TB history (aOR = 4.94, 95% CI:1.46–16.67, p = 0.010), followed by secondary education (aOR = 2.24, 95% CI:1.15–4.35, p = 0.017) and stigma (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI:1.09–3.19, p = 0.023). Older age was associated with reduced odds of HIVDR (25–34 years: aOR = 0.46, 95% CI:0.23–0.93); ≥ 45 years: aOR = 0.44, 95% CI:0.19–0.99). For EFV-positive individuals, being never married increased HIVDR odds (aOR = 3.23, 95% CI:1.05–9.95, p = 0.042), while employment substantially reduced odds (aOR = 0.32, 95% CI:0.10–0.97, p = 0.044). Elevated HIVDR among youth (15–24 years) likely reflects perinatal infection, prolonged paediatric ART, and treatment interruptions during transition to adult care.

conclusionThe 2017 pre-DTG baseline reveals high HIVDR (26.3%) shaped by clinical (ART, TB) and socio-structural (unemployment, stigma, marital status) factors. Distinct provincial and age-specific risk profiles, including youth with paediatric treatment histories, underscore the need for geographically tailored interventions, expanded resistance testing and youth-focused adherence and transition programmes.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralHIV InfectionsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntiretroviral therapy (ART)Associated factorsHIV drug resistance (HIVDR)Provincial disparitiesSouth AfricaVirally unsuppressed

Identifiers

PMID41888747
PMCPMC13141295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.