ArticleBMC cancer2026
Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: subgroup analyses by characteristics of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from a real-world chart review study in Japan (JAVEMACS).
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06412848 (A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study of Avelumab Maintenance and Subsequent Therapies in Japanese Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study of Avelumab Maintenance and Subsequent Therapies in Japanese Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAvelumab maintenance therapy was approved in Japan in February 2021 for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) without disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). We report subgroup analyses from the JAVEMACS chart review study of avelumab maintenance therapy in Japan by characteristics of first-line (1L) PBC.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective study collected data from medical charts of patients with la/mUC who received avelumab maintenance after 1L PBC. Protocol-specified subgroups defined by 1L PBC characteristics (PBC regimen, number of PBC cycles, and best overall response to PBC) were analyzed.
resultsBetween February 2021 and December 2023, 350 patients received avelumab maintenance. Patient characteristics were generally similar across subgroups defined by 1L PBC characteristics. In patients who received 1L gemcitabine + cisplatin (n = 196) or gemcitabine + carboplatin (n = 116), median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI, 31.2 months-not estimable [NE]) and 24.3 months (95% CI, 19.5–30.6 months), respectively. In patients who received 1–3 cycles (n = 68), 4 cycles (n = 205), 5/6 cycles (n = 61), or ≥ 7 cycles (n = 16) of 1L PBC, median OS was 25.0 months (95% CI, 15.2 months-NE), not reached (95% CI, 29.3 months-NE), 31.2 months (95% CI, 18.0 months-NE), and 23.6 months (95% CI, 19.3 months-NE), respectively. In patients with complete response (n = 32), partial response (n = 180), or stable disease (n = 138) as best response to 1L PBC, median OS was not reached (95% CI, 30.6 months-NE), 31.2 months (95% CI, 22.6 months-NE), and 26.5 months (95% CI, 20.2 months-NE), respectively. Across all subgroups, enfortumab vedotin was the most common second-line treatment after discontinuation of avelumab.
conclusionsResults from these descriptive subgroup analyses from JAVEMACS suggest that real-world outcomes with avelumab maintenance therapy are generally consistent regardless of 1L PBC regimen, number of 1L PBC cycles, or best response to 1L PBC. These findings further support the use of avelumab maintenance therapy as a standard of care for patients with la/mUC without disease progression after 1L PBC.
trial registrationNCT06412848.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.