SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2026
Efficacy of swab-based RUT in detecting H. pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a gram-negative bacterium found in the gastric mucosa of humans. In this systematic review, our objective was to assess the diagnostic performance of the swab technique in detecting H. pylori infection.
methodsWe followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched four databases for studies comparing the efficacy of swabs or sweeping techniques in detecting H. pylori infection. Outcomes were diagnostic accuracy measures, such as sensitivity and specificity.
resultsFour studies with 658 patients were included. Compared to conventional diagnosis methods, overall sensitivity was 0.93, with a 95% CI (0.85; 0.97). A confusion matrix was used to summarize the previously mentioned results. Gastric swabs reported a high sensitivity of 93.7%, with a high number of true positives = 285. However, test specificity is moderate (74.1%).
conclusionThese results indicate that gastric swab-based RUT may be helpful as an initial diagnostic test, specifically if a biopsy is difficult. More studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.