ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Diagnostic performance of mDIXON-Quant imaging in assessing glomerulosclerosis severity for chronic kidney disease: a comparative study of R2* and fat fraction parameters.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare two region-of-interest (ROI) measurement methods based on mDIXON-Quant for distinguishing healthy volunteers (HV), chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with low (≤ 15%) and high (> 15%) glomerulosclerosis (GS), and establish a non-invasive auxiliary protocol.
methodsA total of 42 CKD patients and 25 HV underwent mDIXON-Quant MRI. CKD patients were stratified into low (n = 24) and high (n = 18) GS groups via renal biopsy. Two ROI methods were applied: Method 1 (cortex/medulla separation, 15-20 mm² circular ROIs at renal hilum, upper/lower poles) and Method 2 (whole-kidney contour tracing). R2* and fat fraction (FF) parameters were analyzed using ANOVA, LSD tests, and DeLong tests for diagnostic efficacy (AUC).
resultsR2* parameters (RcR2*, RR2*) showed significant differences across groups (P < 0.05), increasing with GS severity. LcR2* and RmR2* distinguished HV from high GS (P < 0.05), while LFF differentiated low vs. high GS (P < 0.05). Combining FF with R2* improved AUC from 0.685 to 0.877 (P < 0.05) for low/high GS discrimination. Method 1's RcR2* (AUC = 0.957) and Method 2's RR2* (AUC = 0.9) were most accurate for distinguishing high GS from HV, with no significant difference between them (P > 0.05). RcR2* outperformed medullary parameters (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe present study demonstrates that employing the Method 2(whole-kidney contour tracing) based on mDIXON-Quant technology enables auxiliary quantitative assessment of the severity of GS via the R2 parameter of the right kidney, thereby confirming its role as an adjunctive tool in GS evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.