Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Association between right-hand 2D:4D ratio and left main coronary artery stenosis in women.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) has been explored as a marker of prenatal hormonal exposure, but its association with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis, particularly in women, remains unclear. This prospective observational study included 400 patients undergoing coronary angiography and cardiac surgery. Right- and left-hand 2D:4D ratios were measured, and LMCA stenosis was assessed angiographically. Exploratory analyses evaluated potential associations between right-hand 2D:4D ratios and selected postoperative outcomes, including intensive care unit length of stay and acute kidney injury. Female patients were further stratified according to LMCA stenosis (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%), and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Among female patients, right-hand 2D:4D ratios were significantly higher in those with LMCA stenosis ≥ 50% compared with those with < 50% stenosis, whereas no significant association was observed for left-hand 2D:4D ratios. In penalized multivariable regression analysis, the right-hand 2D:4D ratio remained independently associated with significant LMCA stenosis in female patients. No clinically meaningful associations were identified between right-hand 2D:4D ratios and selected postoperative outcomes in either sex. However, given the small number of events, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. These findings suggest a potential sex-specific association between prenatal hormonal markers and LMCA disease severity in women. Further validation in larger cohorts is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.