ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: the perspective of birth companions.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious personal, cultural, and family factors shape the attitudes of birth companions towards childbirth and influence how they understand and support the childbirth process. This study aimed to explore the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of companions of women who underwent cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR).
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted through individual, face-to-face, semi-structured, and in-depth interviews, analysed using thematic analysis within a descriptive phenomenological research approach. Participants included companions of women who underwent CDMR.
resultsThe companions mainly spouses and close family members perceived CDMR as a legitimate decision focused on the woman’s safety and comfort. Three main themes emerged: support for women’s decision-making, the influence of previous negative experiences, and the right to choose. The narratives revealed emotional and gender dimensions, with men assuming a supportive role and relatives emphasising fear of pain and maternal protection. Overall, participants expressed confidence in the healthcare team and recognised cesarean delivery to ensure the well-being of both mother and baby.
conclusionsThe findings indicate that companions play a significant role in decision-making regarding CDMR, influencing the maternal experience and sharing responsibility in the process. This highlights the need for institutional policies and practices that promote education for companions, active participation in decision-making, structured emotional support, and protocols that reconcile clinical safety with women’s autonomy, while considering social, cultural, and family dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.