ArticleScientific reports2026
The river erosion and deposition algorithm with adaptive search dynamics for balancing exploration and exploitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rife with optimization problems, from automating feature engineering and hyperparameter tuning to training intricate neural networks. Finding a balance between exploration and exploitation remains a significant challenge, despite the widespread usage of metaheuristic algorithms to tackle these complex black-box problems. We suggest the River Erosion and Deposition Algorithm (REDA), a unique search technique for numerical and engineering optimization, as a solution to this problem. In order to simulate a dynamic equilibrium state, the algorithm incorporates an adaptive search weight that alternates cyclically between local exploitation and global exploration. While a randomized Boolean operator preserves population diversity, its position-updating process incorporates a stochastic recombination of current population members with an elite memory set to direct the search. We used 19 constrained engineering optimization problems and 29 unconstrained CEC2017 benchmark test functions in a systematic validation process to assess REDA's performance. According to experimental results, REDA performs noticeably better than 13 cutting-edge comparator algorithms. The higher performance of REDA, especially in low-dimensional areas, is confirmed by statistical analyses based on the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Furthermore, when utilized to detect parameters in a solar system, REDA showed good accuracy and stability. Collectively, these tests verify that the proposed method effectively balances exploration and exploitation in difficult solution domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.