ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting surgical outcome in drug-resistant epilepsy by combining interictal biomarkers within a machine learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delineating the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is essential for achieving seizure freedom in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Conventionally, seizure onset derived from ictal intracranial EEG (iEEG) approximates the EZ, but acquiring ictal data can be challenging. Interictal iEEG abnormalities offer abundant, non-seizure-dependent markers of the epileptogenic tissue; however, these biomarkers offer limited specificity. Here, we propose a machine learning framework that integrates interictal spike and ripple features to predict the epileptogenic contacts targeted for surgical removal and the patient’s surgical outcome. We retrospectively analyzed iEEG data from 62 children with DRE [34 with good outcome (Engel I)], automatically detected spikes and ripples, and computed temporal, spectral, and spatial features for each channel. Using combinations of these features and the resected contacts as targets, we trained Random Forest classifiers using only good outcome patients to estimate epileptogenic contacts. Spike-based and combined spike and ripple features outperformed individual biomarkers in predicting the epileptogenic contacts with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 and 74% spatial overlap with resection. Although most individual features and classifiers predicted outcome, the combined feature model performed best (i.e., sensitivity 88%, specificity 68%, and accuracy 79%). Our findings demonstrate that integrating multimodal interictal features improves the identification of epileptogenic contacts providing valuable prognostic insights for epilepsy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.