ArticleScientific reports2026
Stress and microseismic activity in hard roof thick coal seams under varying mining rates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To clarify the influence of mining rates on the fracturing of hard roofs in thick coal seams and the patterns of microseismic activity, a comprehensive approach combining field investigations, numerical simulations, and on-site validation was adopted. This study revealed the stress and energy evolution laws of hard roofs in mining faces under different mining rate effects, elucidated the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of microseismic events under varying mining rates, and subsequently optimized the mining rates for different rock burst risk zones in the working face to ensure safe and efficient mining operations. Furthermore, the study optimized the mining rates for different rock burst hazard zones in the working face. The results indicate that as the mining rate of the working face increases, the peak abutment pressure ahead of the coal wall shifts closer to the exposed surface, leading to an increase in the accumulated elastic energy in the roof, which raises the likelihood of inducing rock bursts. Under low-speed mining, microseismic events are predominantly distributed ahead of the coal wall, while under high-speed mining, they are primarily concentrated behind it. On-site validation demonstrated that controlling the mining rates for moderate and low rock burst hazard zones at 6.4 m/d and 4.8 m/d, respectively, resulted in both the frequency and energy of microseismic events remaining at relatively low levels, thereby achieving the objective of ensuring safe and efficient mining operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.