ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Motor fatigue and fatigability in early multiple sclerosis patients: an analysis of clinical, radiological and psychological underpinnings.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional connectivity dynamics of monoaminergic circuits related to fatigue in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Walking fatigability indices correspond with perception of changes in gait speed and quality during an instrumented 6-minute walking test in people with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile fatigue is highly reported in newly diagnosed people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) and motor fatigability is reported in about 20% of non-disabled patients, relationship among them in early MS has been less studied.
objectiveTo evaluate correlations between fatigue and motor fatigability in early pwMS, and their clinical, radiological, psychological underpinnings.
methodsRelapsing pwMS aged 18-65 years, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <2.0, disease duration <5 years were recruited. PwMS underwent clinical, cognitive, radiological assessment. They performed a 6-minute-walking-test; fatigability was calculated as the ratio of distance walked in the final minute to the first minute (distance walking index, DWI6−1). Fatigue was evaluated through the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). Spearman ρ examined the relationship among variables; linear regression analyses examined predictors of fatigue and fatigability.
results70 pwMS (age 37.8+11years; female n=50, 71.4%, EDSS 1.5[1;2]) were enrolled. 15 (21.4%) reported significant levels of fatigue, 14 (20%) presented motor fatigability. Fatigue and motor fatigability were not significantly correlated with one another (ρ=0.100;p=0.425) or with other clinical, cognitive, radiological features. Fatigue was related to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale (ρ=0.375,p=0.002), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (ρ=0.543;p<0.001), neuroticism (ρ=0.313;p=0.006), and all subscales of MS-Quality-Of-Life 54. We did not find predictors of fatigability, while HADS-anxiety (b=0.76; p=0.003) and BDI-II (b=0.33; p=0.009) significantly predicted fatigue.
conclusionsOur results support different neurobiological underpinnings for motor fatigue and fatigability and reinforce the need for a multidimensional assessment from the earliest stages of the disease, to tailor therapeutic and rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.